Voronenkov Wikipedia Biography

The darling is for nothing that the details of his service and deputy were recorded in all Wikipedias of the Universe, and the story of his flight was not found out over the past week except that the fathers-dumb people in the deaf northern monasteries-mysterious, and that’s it. The ex-deputy himself, it seems, was inclined to the mythologization of his own past, and the publications that followed his exposure interviews with the Ukrainian press, not that this myth is exposed, but as if they were giving it a new dimension.

Either he served in the Federal Drug Control Service, or he did not, or he investigated the case of “three whales”, or did not have a relationship with him, the deputy mayor of Naryan-Mar, the professor-legalist with a hundred scientific publications, shot his leg for his career purposes, was detained for a fight by the FSB operative in a restaurant-only a person who has never lived in Russia can be surprised, and only such a person is able to accept such a person, and only such a person is able to accept such a person.

them on faith. Obviously, all that we have learned over the past days and weeks about Voronenkov’s biography and the circumstances of his escape-we learned for some reason, all these facts should be divided into our own confidence in the anonymous telegrams and sources that wished to remain unknown. The era of post -truth, as was said. One thing can be asserted reliably: until recently, Voronenkov was a deputy of the State Duma, he was a member of the Communist Party of the Communist Party of the Communist Party, although he could have consisted in any other, put forward a bill on restricting the share of foreign owners in the media, stigmatized Bandera in Ukraine, supported the return of Crimea to his native harbor - in general, he did everything that was supposed to the Russian deputy.

His current statements - that, they say, he was forced to pretend, and deep down he walked in his leg, and when the system decided to deal with the next rebellious, he chose freedom - they look like a continuation of another long -standing Russian tradition: Voronenkov is already compared with the prince of Kurbsky or Soviet fusion. And this, of course, explains the instantic metamorphosis that happened to him: from history it is known that from systemic bureaucratic obedience to “jump-in-way” is always one step.

Often you have to hear that Voronenkov is only the first swallow, as the regime will weaken, there will be more such overdue, and it will gradually turn out that absolutely the entire Russian elite was against the accession of Crimea, and it was not clear who in the Duma, using other people's cards. And, perhaps, the case of the deputy Voronenkov is really model, exemplary, but not in the sense that he “saw” or “could finally tell the truth”, but in some other.

This is not careerism and not double, but some new human feature, bred over the years of Putin's stability. In anticipation of the live broadcast, the guests shared his impressions of the New Year holidays-the deputy spent them in Florida and enthusiastically told about Hemingway's house-museum in Ki-Ust. The deputy earned, the deputy, without interrupting, began to brand the American agents who strive to undermine the foundations, the journalist objected: have mercy, but you just rested in America for two weeks - what the deputy, without blinking an eye, replied: “In what other America?

I was with my voters in Tatarstan! It is clear that for some reason he told both stories: in one case, he needed to appear to a secular educated person, in another, to present himself as a patriot-anti-alignment. Ethics specialists will someday find for her an exact name-this is the ability to instantly redraw their own beliefs and even a biography depending on the situation.

Stories about the participation in the “Three Whales” case or a personal conflict with General Feoktistov, accusations against Bandera and foreign agents, the exposure of the hellish state machine, which makes the whole elite support the accession of Crimea is a kind of social armor, instantly changing the color depending on the situation; How the classic sang: "You, like water, you always take the form of the one with whom you are." The fact that is under this armor - about the hellish mixture from fake scientific publications, bribes for the termination of the criminal case and fights with Feesbushniki in restaurants - it is better not to think.

Actually, this armor exists so that an extraneous look does not penetrate these abysses, this is a cloak of an invisible man, under which is a muddy criminogenic darkness. And just in case, the heading has nothing to do with the ex-deputy Maria Maksakova, and this story is not about her.