Wikipedia Biography Glazunov

This term also has other meanings, see quotes [edit] Leningrad, with his communal houses, his palace square, his Neva, bridges, wind ... Hermitage - flickering, as if candles reflected in the parquet, dark breakthroughs of paintings in gilded frames ... as far as I remembered myself, I painted myself. My first impression in the conscious life is a piece of the blue sky with a dazzlingly white foam of clouds, the road drowning in the field of daisies, and the mysterious forest in the distance.

From this moment, as if someone turned me on, saying: “Live! I need to feel the inner music of the soul of the person whose portrait I write. An ideal environment - if classical music sounds at the same time: it creates a mood. Each portrait is an exam for me, I have no right to write it indifferently. Each person is the Universe, everyone is unusually interesting: the builder, and the astronaut, the famous film actress, and the Vietnamese militia, and the miner, and the student working on the BAM ...

Drawing a person does not mean to draw a compliment to him, only to tell the truth! And it should be similar, otherwise it is not a portrait. Portrait - a document of the human spirit, a real form of humanism. Chekhov is a whiner. Like all Soviet films of the last period of existence. There is not a single film that would inspire Russia. They were made by the eyes not sons.

And they achieved their own. For these films, as well as according to Chekhov’s books, it does not understand who created such a great Russia, which is now robbing ten years and cannot be plundered in any way? Who created weapons, army, great culture? Do not understand. Around little men who are worth crushing anything. Where are the Suvorov miracle bogatri? Where are the Petrine chicks?

Where are the conquerors of Siberia? After all, Dostoevsky was also convicted by all for saying: Constantinople will be ours! It is necessary to criticize the shortcomings, but in the name of Russia, and not despising it. The sovereign knew about the possible organized death and took a word from Pushkin so that he would not fight for a duel. Pushkin could not hold back the words and was killed.

Further, the second block is powerful - Dostoevsky. The authorities always fought with his ideology. Always his ideas were rejected by an omasible intelligentsia. And here is another block - Leo Tolstoy. Russian literary genius, but letting Russia downhill. He wrote against the Fatherland, was going to rewrite the Gospel and ended up fled the unknown and unknown why.

I do not like Leo Tolstoy as a person. But I do not accept his personal maxims. About the reasons for the defeat of the year, about Kutuzov and Napoleon, it is not written. Moreover, Christianity, professed by our ancestors and us, is Orthodoxy - and there is a god of the healing through the son of their Galilean Christ, who has been trying to distort, tore out the flame of the heroic spirit from him for two thousand years, with the setting of cheeks for whipping every offender.

Or, as the brilliant Russian writer Lev Tolstoy, “do not enjoy evil by force, loved to preach with Pantalyk, loved to preach with Pantalyk” - disarm and do not resist. It is precisely by force to resist evil! Lomonosov openly opposed the racist theory of Normanism and its “founders” in the person of all these helmeters, Millers and Co., who so wanted to present our story “Low and Vile”.

Since then, to this day, the battle around the fundamental question has not subsided - “where did the Russian land come from”, who we are - the great independent people or, in the arrogant expression of Hegel, “manure of history”. In the stubborn and fundamental battle of this exceptional place belongs to Vasily Markovich Florinsky - a true scientist - a physician, archaeologist, historian, a Slavist who devoted himself to the service of Russia ...

Vasily Markovich carried out a giant work, comparing the archaeological finds of the red -dinked sliman of Troy, the adriatic venues is well known, that wenes are not Slavs, which is not the Slavs. Both ours and Western historians, as well as the Baltic Venetes with finds in the North Russian and South Russian mounds, can deny. The similarity of the found objects of life, ornaments from the Venetskiy - more precisely, Slavic - lands with Siberian mound objects were so amazing that there was no doubt - we are talking about the historical existence of different branches of a single mighty Aryan people - Proto -Slavs.

Only Florinsky gives the testimony of Ptolemy, who already in the year from the Nativity of Christ called the Slavs the Slavs. Soviet scientists attributed the emergence of the historical concept of “Slavs” only to the V - VI century BC.